Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1925No. 6 Div. 319PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBottldin, J.

This is a certiorari to review the judgment of the circuit court, awarding compensation to an injured employee under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Acts 1919, p. 206).

In the findings of fact by the trial judge, it is said:

“Accordingly, it is the conclusion of the court and of the undersigned judge thereof, first, that plaintiff was injured by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment; second, that defendant had actual knowledge of the fact of his injury within 90 days of its occurrence, which the court finds to have been on February 22, 1924, and that this actual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mt. Carmel Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Duluth Diamond Drilling Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Crookston Lumber Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Ex Parte HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Russell Coal Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Baughn v. Little Cahaba Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Beatrice Foods Company v. ClemonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Ragland Brick Co. v. CampbellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API