Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCARLO, Judge:
Plaintiff contests the classification under item 605.05, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), of two entries of precious metal contact tape from the Federal Republic of Germany claiming that the correct classification is under item 685.90, TSUS. Defendant now seeks classification under item 605.66, TSUS. Since defendant concedes that Customs classification was erroneous, no presumption of correctness attaches to the classification urged by defendant. See Jarvis Clark Co. v. United States, 733 F.2d 873, reh’g denied, 739 F.2d 628…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Avins Industrial Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Finn Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Nicholas v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benteler Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Ludvig Svensson (U.S.) Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Millenium Lumber Distribution Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007