Legal Opinion

Finn Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 17, 1972No. 5433, C.A.D. 1042PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AlmoNd, Judge.

This is an appeal by the importer from the decision and judgment of the First Division of the United States Customs Court1 wherein it was held that certain imported ivory roses were properly classifiable under the provision for jewelry, item 740.35, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), dutiable at 55 per centum ad valorem.

Appellant claimed alternatively that the merchandise was dutiable (1) as imitation gemstones under item 741.35, TSUS, at the rate of seven per centum ad valorem; or (2) as semiprecious stones, out but not set, and suitable for use in the manufacture of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. D. Lisner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Finn Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. E.R. Hawthorne & Co., Inc., A/c Veped Traffic Controls, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. Avins Industrial Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  5. Riekes Crisa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API