Legal Opinion

Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 21, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-187; Court 02-00705PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AQUILINO, Senior Judge.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction having been denied by the court in slip opinion 03-148, 27 CIT 1703, 293 F.Supp.2d 1360 (2003), reh’g denied (Nov. 18, 2004), familiarity with which is presumed, the parties have now interposed cross-motions for summary judgment as to the correct classification of certain imported ceramic substrates for electronic integrated circuits (“IC substrates”) that underlie this action.

I

As recited in slip opinion 03-148, .paragraph 7 of the amended complaint avers that,

[p]rio…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API