Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AQUILINO, Senior Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction having been denied by the court in slip opinion 03-148, 27 CIT 1703, 293 F.Supp.2d 1360 (2003), reh’g denied (Nov. 18, 2004), familiarity with which is presumed, the parties have now interposed cross-motions for summary judgment as to the correct classification of certain imported ceramic substrates for electronic integrated circuits (“IC substrates”) that underlie this action.
I
As recited in slip opinion 03-148, .paragraph 7 of the amended complaint avers that,
[p]rio…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007