Legal Opinion

Berglund v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1967No. 38842PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hale, J. —

For many years, nearly 40 in some instances, the city of Tacoma’s water division has furnished water to 13 homes outside the city limits in the northeast Tacoma area. Other residents of the area sought the same service at the same rates, and to that end 52.76 per cent of the property owners within the proposed area petitioned the city to extend Tacoma’s water system into their district by means of a local improvement district.

Thereupon, the city council of Tacoma enacted ordinance No. 17894 creating LID No. 5408, a district wholly outside of but adjacent to Tacoma’s corporate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Comfort v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hansen v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Washington Mutual Savings Bank v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Frese v. City of Normandy ParkWashington Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Louthan v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Seattle v. Rogers Clothing for Men, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Citizens for Underground Equality v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API