Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Rogers Clothing for Men, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1990No. 56188-5PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J.—

Facts of Case

In this case we consider whether a Seattle city ordinance establishing a special assessment area in downtown Seattle exceeded its statutory basis or violated the Constitution of the State of Washington. We hold that the ordinance is constitutional and that Seattle did not exceed its statutory authority by enacting it.

In 1971, the Legislature enacted RCW 35.87A allowing municipalities to establish "Parking and Business Improvement Areas". This statute authorizes a city to establish such an area after a petition is submitted by the businesses responsible for 60 percent…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Omega National Insurance v. MarquardtWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. 2nd Roc-Jersey Associates v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API