Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1969No. 40519PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County intends to establish underground electrical distribution systems in new housing developments. To encourage land developers to install new underground systems and to persuade householders in the new housing developments to buy electrical energy and service, the PUD offers substantial inducements. Washington Natural Gas Company, on the asserted grounds that these inducements constitute gifts and loans of money and credit in violation of the state constitution and contravene the Unfair Business Practices —Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, seeks…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Johns v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State Ex. Rel. Wash. Nav. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Williamson v. Grant County Public Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API