Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Washington Mutual Savings Bank v. City of Bellingham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1935No. 25534. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This proceeding was instituted on the relation of Washington Mutual Savings Bank, a corporation, for the purpose of procuring a writ of mandamus requiring the city of Bellingham, a municipal corporation, and certain of its officers, to issue and approve warrants in favor of relator, drawn upon the local improvement guaranty fund of the city of Bellingham, in payment of bonds numbered 8 to 28, inclusive, together with interest coupons attached thereto, issued by the city of Bellingham in connection with local improvement district No. 869 (this district having defaulted), the total amount of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comfort v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Kelly v. City of SunnysideWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hallahan v. City of Port AngelesWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Amburn v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Longview Co. v. LynnWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Chesterley v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Connick v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API