Legal Opinion

Comfort v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1927No. 20073. En BancPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

The purpose of this suit is to test the validity and constitutionality of what is known as the local improvement guaranty fund provided for by statute. To achieve that result, this action was brought to set aside a tax levy made by the city of Tacoma in 1925, for the benefit of its local improvement guaranty fund. Upon the sustaining of a demurrer, plaintiffs have appealed.

A brief history of the statutes and ordinances and their purposes will be helpful to an understanding of the points raised.

Prior to 1917, many of the cities of the state of Washington had outstanding local improvement bonds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Griffin v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dean v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Stanley v. JeffriesMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Conrad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API