Legal Opinion

Hansen v. City of Havre

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1941No. 8,217PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

This is an original proceeding in this court for an injunction. Tbe complaint sets out that tbe governing body of tbe defendant city created special improvement district No. 179 in tbe city of Havre for tbe purpose of constructing a diversion dam and necessary appurtenances, some within and some without tbe city limits, for tbe purpose of protecting tbe city from injury by tbe overflow of water from Bull Hook Creek and Scott Coulee; that the entire estimated cost of the proposed project chargeable against special improvement district No. 179 is tbe sum of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Interstate Lumber Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Stanley v. JeffriesMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Comfort v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Soliri v. FassoMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State ex rel. Stiefel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Grossman v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Swan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Banner v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bascom v. CarpenterMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City of Pueblo v. FlandersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API