Dalton v. Gore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALENTINE, J., pro tem.
This was an action brought by plaintiffs and respondents against defendants and appellants for money due under contract. The case was tried on the amended and supplemental complaint of plaintiffs, upon an amendment thereto, and upon the original answer of defendants stipulated to stand as answering plaintiffs' amended complaint.
The amended and supplemental complaint of plaintiffs contained four separate counts or causes of action, the first being on the contract as plaintiffs claimed it was entered into and agreed upon while the second, third and fourth causes of action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Blanc v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Nowland v. KierulffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Smeade v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Shields v. Fee Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Barnes v. CockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931