Legal Opinion
Nowland v. Kierulff
California Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1904No. S.F. No. 3446PublishedCited by 26 opinions
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a petition for partial distribution of the estate of a deeéased person. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the hearing of this case in Department an opinion was prepared by Mr. Commissioner Haynes, of which the following portion is now adopted as part of the opinion of the court: —
"Katherine Nowland appeals from an order made on her petition for partial distribution of said estate.
"Susanna Brown died testate in the city and county of San Francisco, on the twenty-seventh day of September, 1899. The petition alleged that the will of said deceased was duly admitted to probate, and that T.C. Kierulff and Albert C. Hooper were duly appointed the executors thereof, and letters testamentary were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mackay v. MackayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bartlett v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Booth v. AmmermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1856
- Matter of DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by26 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of BournCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sponable v. DareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of LockhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.