Legal Opinion

Shields v. Fee Title Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASTE1 2, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action under the provisions of the McEnerney Act (Stats. 1906 [Ex. Sess.], p. 78), to quiet her title to five separate and distinct parcels of unimproved real property, situate in San Mateo County, and particularly described in the complaint. The defendant, The Fee Title Co., answered, and directly placed in issue plaintiff’s title to all or any part of the property, and prayed for affirmative relief. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff, and The Fee Title Co. appeals on the judgment-roll alone. i

No separate findings, as such, were made, but the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dalton v. GoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smeade v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Carey v. BowieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API