Legal Opinion

Purnell v. Rockingham Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

At common law a civil action could not be maintained against one who had negligently caused the death of another (Craig v. Lumber Co., 189 N. C., 137), but in 1854 the Legislature enacted a statute authorizing suit by the personal representative of any person whose death had been caused by neglect, default, or wrongful act. Laws of N. C., 1854, ch. 39. It was provided in section 3 tbat the jury might give such damages as' they should deem fair and just, having regard to the pecuniary injury resulting from the wrongful death. The substance of this statute was brought forward by the Legislature…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Pickett v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Jeremiah M. Kesler v. . William A. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Benton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DiDonato v. WortmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  3. Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Rea v. . SimowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API