Bryant v. Woodlief
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DeNny,' J.
Each defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit.
The appellant Woodlief insists that if he was negligent his negligence was insulated by the negligence of the defendant Ray in turning his car in front of him, and he cites in support of his position Hudson v. Transit Co., 250 N.C. 435, 108 S.E. 2d 900; Aldridge v. Hasty, 240, N.C. 353, 82 S.E. 2d 331; and Butner v. Spease, 217 N.C. 82, 6 S.E. 2d 808.
The test of whether the negligent conduct of one tort feasor is to be insulated as a matter of law by the independent act of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Hinzman v. PalmanteerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Wooldridge v. WoolettWashington Supreme Court · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.