Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1926PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The exception addressed to the refusal of the court to grant the defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit cannot be sustained. The evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The motion was properly overruled on authority of McAllister v. Pryor, 187 N. C., 832, where the question is fully discussed in a valuable opinion by Associate Justice Clarkson.

But we think the trial court committed error, prejudicial to the defendant, in the admission, over objection, of the evidence of Dr. Ambler, father of plaintiff’s intestate, to the effect that he had seen a.letter from a Mr.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Benton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Ward v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. McAllister v. . PryorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Mendenhall v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Gay v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Coach Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API