Legal Opinion

United States v. Brooks

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1949No. 5758, 5759PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Chief Judge.

These are appeals by the United States from judgments in favor of claimants under the Federal Tort Claims Act of August 2, 1946, 60 Stat. 842, 28 U.S.C.A. § 921 [now § 2671 et seq]. This court reversed the judgments on the ground that the act was not thought to apply to claims of soldiers in the United States Army, 4 Cir., 169 F.2d 840; but the decision of reversal was in turn reversed by the Supreme Court. Brooks v. United States, 337 U.S. 49, 69 S.Ct. 918, 921. That court has remanded the cases to us for “consideration of the problem of reducing damages pro tanto”,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Holland v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. William D. HandelsmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Donald Feeley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. Harue HayashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. William H. Price, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API