Legal Opinion

Word v. Motorola, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1983No. 16240-PRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff was assigned by his employer, Paramount Designs Systems, Inc. (Paramount) to work at Motorola, Inc. (defendant). During the course of this employment, plaintiff was injured on defendant’s premises. He filed a workmen’s compensation claim against Paramount and received benefits from its carrier. He then filed a negligence action against defendant. Defendant claimed it was plaintiff’s employer and that workmen’s compensation was plaintiff’s exclusive remedy. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on this issue and the court of appeals…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gaudet v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Livingston v. Citizen's Utility, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Wagner v. Coronet HotelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Evans v. WebsterColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Pinter Construction Co. v. FrisbyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tellez v. SabanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API