Legal Opinion

Drozda v. McComas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 1, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 93-569PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Susan Marie MeComas (“defendant”) argues that the trial court erred in awarding Christina Theresa Marie Drozda (“plaintiff’) costs as a “successful party” pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-341 (1992) and in failing to award defendant expert witness fees pursuant to Rule 68, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. We hold that where a plaintiff obtains an award of damages less favorable than the defendant’s Rule 68 offer of judgment, (1) the plaintiff is still the successful party in the lawsuit and is entitled to both pre-offer and post-offer costs, and (2) the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Word v. Motorola, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Meredith v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  4. John R. Alley & Co. v. Federal Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Daily Gazette Co. v. West Virginia Development OfficeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. SourantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Braunberger v. Interstate Engineering, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Henry v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API