Davis v. Dodson
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Pinal. Joseph H. Kibbey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.
There was a judgment below ^r the amount of a promissory note, and foreclosing a mortgage made to secure the payment of the same, and ordering a sale of the premises to pay both the principal and interest of the note. There being no assignment of errors, we will not look further than to determine if there be any error apparent upon the face of the record, and which goes to the foundation of the action. Gila R. I. Co. v. Wolfley, 3 Ariz. 176, 24 Pac. 257. This disposes of the alleged error in denying the motion for a change of venue. It has not been saved in the record.
It is claimed, however,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wolfley v. Gila River Irrigation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1890
- Bank of San Luis Obispo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Hooper v. StumpArizona Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Consolidated Publishing Co. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1931