Legal Opinion
Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 18, 2005No. 1 CA-JV 04-0165PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 In 2003 the Arizona legislature provided that “[a] hearing to terminate parental rights ... shall be tried to a jury” if a parent requests. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 8-223 (Supp.2004). The rules of juvenile procedure were then amended to require the State to provide notice to parents of that right. Ariz. R.P. Juv. Ct. 64(C). The issue in this opin ion 1 is whether the State’s error in failing to provide this notice warrants a new termination hearing. We determine that in this case it does not.
Facts and Procedural History
¶ 2 Monica C. (“Monica”) appeals from the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Crystal E. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.