Chenoweth v. Budge
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Santa Cruz. W. A. O’Connor, Judge. STATEMENT OP PACTS BY THE COURT. The parties to this cause have stipulated that the findings of the court are the facts of this ease.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Santa Cruz. W. A. O’Connor, Judge. STATEMENT OP PACTS BY THE COURT. The parties to this cause have stipulated that the findings of the court are the facts of this ease. The findings are .as follows: “1. That heretofore, to wit, on or about the 11th day of May, 1912, at an election in Nogales school district No. 1, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, regularly called for that purpose, the majority of' the qualified school electors voted in favor of establishing a high school .in the said district. “2. That at the call of the comity…
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The parties have stipulated that the record consists of the complaint, answer, judgment, motion for new trial, notice of appeal and the stipulation signed by the attorneys for the respective parties and approved by the trial judge. The stipulation contains this provision:
“It is further stipulated and agreed that the only question or issue submitted for the consideration and decision of the supreme court in this appeal is whether or not the mass meeting held by the electors of Nogales School District No. 1, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, on the 25th day of May, 1912, was or was not a compliance…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of Lowell v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. LubetkinArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- State Consolidated Publishing Co. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1931