Legal Opinion

Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1976No. 46525PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Chief Justice.

Relator, W. O. Kenzie, sought review by writ of certiorari of a decision of the commissioner of employment services. By order filed March 15, 1976, the writ was discharged for relator’s failing to serve it upon the respondent within the time prescribed by law.

Rule 115.01, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, provides as follows:

“Review of a decision of * * * [the] Department of Employment Services * * * may be had by securing issuance of a writ of certiorari within sixty (60) days after the party applying for such writ shall have received written notice of the decision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mocuik v. SvobodaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Jackson v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF MANPOWER SERVICESSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. In Re Consolidation of County Ditches Nos. 20, 38, 41, 49 & 53Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Contribution Rate for 1973 of Fingerhut Corp. v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Ullman v. LutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of J.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. King v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Flame Bar, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appealCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Wilkins v. City of GlencoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API