Legal Opinion

Ullman v. Lutz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1952No. 35,935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Upon respondents’ motion to dismiss an appeal for want of jurisdiction, we have the sole question of whether this court has acquired appellate jurisdiction where a notice of appeal has been served upon the respondents within the time allowed by statute but has not been served or filed with the cleric of the district court until after the time allowed to perfect an appeal has expired.

The issue arises out of a case for the partition of real estate wherein the district court entered an interlocutory judgment decreeing that the real estate be partitioned by sale on September 19,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Gelin v. HollisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Elliott v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. State v. SueySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Northern Oil & Gas Co. v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. King v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Dempsey v. MeighenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API