Legal Opinion
King v. University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 3, 1986No. CX-86-97PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Relator George King seeks review of a determination by the Department of Jobs and Training that he was discharged from his teaching position for misconduct and was not entitled to receive unemployment compensation. Respondent University of Minnesota has challenged the jurisdiction of this court on procedural grounds, claiming that King’s petition for the writ of certiorari was untimely. We agree with respondent that the writ must be discharged.
Minn.Stat. § 268.10, subd. 8 (1984) provides:
Any decision of the commissioner may be reviewed on certiorari by the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marriage of Tischendorf v. TischendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Leer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Baldinger Baking Co. v. StepanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Gonsior v. Alternative Staffing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Klopfenstein v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality v. Department of Central ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Johnson v. Metropolitan Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.