Legal Opinion
Wilkins v. City of Glencoe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1992No. CX-91-1300PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The trial court denied a demand for removal of a conciliation court case to district court as untimely. We reverse.
FACTS
The basement of respondents’ house was flooded by rain on July 26 and July 27, 1990, because appellant’s storm sewer lines were blocked. The flooding was substantial; at one time there was approximately six feet of water in the basement. The water sat for four or five days while appel lant tried to fix the problem. Respondents sued appellant in conciliation court for negligently maintaining the storm sewer lines resulting in property damage and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Wilkie v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Flame Bar, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Reichel v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roehrdanz v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- E.N. v. Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Barrera v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Roehrdanz v. BrillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Reynolds v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.