Legal Opinion

State v. Ingram

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1967No. 173PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The record in this case does not show what disposition, if any, was made of the charges of felonious breaking and entering. Defendants’ case on appeal states that each defendant was charged in a bill of indictment with the crime of larceny of goods of the value of more than $200.00. The record fails to show an indictment charging larceny of goods of the value of more than $200.00 against defendant Otto Seawood, Jr. The verdict of the jury as to Otto Seawood, Jr., was guilty of larceny of goods of value of more than $200.00.

In the case of State v. Whitaker, 89 N.C. 472, the Court, speaking to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The People v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. HaiglerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API