State v. Cooke
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The defendant’s assignments of error are: (1) The trial court erred in ruling that the seven-year-old prosecuting witness was competent to testify, and (2) the court erred in denying defendant’s motions for nonsuit and arrest of judgment.
There was no error in holding that the child who was the victim of this offense was a competent witness. There is no age below which one is incompetent as a matter of law to testify. The test of competency is the capacity of the proposed witness to understand and to relate under the obligation of an oath facts which will assist the jury in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.