State v. Haigler
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
We are not concerned on this appeal with the charge of driving an automobile while his driver’s license was in a state of suspension because the defendant was found not guilty on that charge. Nor are we concerned with the charge of receiving stolen goods knowing them to have been stolen because the judge did not submit that charge to the jury.
The printed copy of the record on appeal does not indicate the fact that the bill of indictment was amended, but a photostatic copy of it filed herein with a “Motion in Arrest of Judgment” does reveal that the typewritten word…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- State v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. . CodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. PeeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BohannonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996