Legal Opinion

State v. Cochran

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1949PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBae-NHill, J.

As an averment negativing the possession of a license is not essential, the warrant charges a criminal offense. The defendant was convicted on evidence unchallenged by exception or by motion to dismiss as in case of nonsuit. There was no prayer for a directed verdict. The cause was submitted to the jury under a charge admittedly free from error and the verdict is in proper form. So then, there is no exception in the record which challenges the validity of the trial or verdict.

The only exceptions and assignments of error in the record are directed to the alleged error of the court in (1)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State v. . ChoateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API