State v. Drummond
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss because the evidence of defendant’s age and of penetration was insufficient to support a judgment of delinquency.
The juvenile petition issued in this case states in pertinent part:
3. The following offense(s) or condition(s) is/are alleged:
That the above named child is a delinquent child as defined by G.S. 7A-517G2) in that at and in the county named above on or about the 10th day of May 1984 the above named child did unlawfully, willfully and feloniously carnally know and abuse Natasha…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. BillingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In re R.P.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.