In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Magar
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline case, the accused challenges only the sanction imposed on him by a trial panel for violation of the disciplinary rules. We agree with, and therefore sustain, the sanction imposed by the trial panel.
The facts concerning the relevant cause of complaint are agreed, and may be stated briefly: The accused purchased an apartment complex in Kelso, Washington, from the Millers on a land sale contract. The complex subsequently suffered significant fire damage. Western Claims, an insurance company, issued a draft in the amount of $7,000 as partial payment under the policy of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HoppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SassorOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DinermanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of UnreinOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.