Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Magar

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1991No. OSB 88-5, 88-81, 89-5; SC 29172PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline case, the accused challenges only the sanction imposed on him by a trial panel for violation of the disciplinary rules. We agree with, and therefore sustain, the sanction imposed by the trial panel.

The facts concerning the relevant cause of complaint are agreed, and may be stated briefly: The accused purchased an apartment complex in Kelso, Washington, from the Millers on a land sale contract. The complex subsequently suffered significant fire damage. Western Claims, an insurance company, issued a draft in the amount of $7,000 as partial payment under the policy of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HoppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SassorOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DinermanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of UnreinOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API