Legal Opinion
In Re Porter
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1995No. OSB 92-118; SC S41229PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the accused is charged with violating Disciplinary Rules (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty)1 and 7-106(0(5) (failure to comply with known local customs of courtesy)2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility. A trial panel of the disciplinary board found the accused guilty on both counts and suspended him from the practice of law for 30 days. The accused requested direct review by this court. Bar Rules of Procedure (BR) 10.3. On de novo review, ORS 9.536(3), we find the accused guilty of the DR 1-102(A)(3) charge and suspend him for 63…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thornton v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Port Investment Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Holmes v. WhitakerOregon Supreme Court · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.