In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Sassor
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In 1983, 1 the Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against the accused alleging seven specific charges, contained in four causes of complaint, involving two clients of the accused. The first three causes involved the representation by the accused of Mr. Dillon. The fourth cause arises out of the accused’s representation of Mrs. Lafky.
The Trial Board found the accused guilty of three charges and recommended disbarment. The Disciplinary Review Board found the accused guilty of four charges and recommended a one year suspension from practice and the successful completion of an approved course on…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MagarOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SassorOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of YacobOregon Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.