Legal Opinion
Attard v. Bd. of Supervisors of Contra Costa Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 29, 2017No. A138702PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REARDON, ACTING P. J.
*1069The plaintiffs in this action, Paul and Tamara Attard (Attards), formulated a creative solution to circumstances constraining development on their two properties in Contra Costa County (County), but they failed to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for their plan. Notwithstanding that failure, the county issued them permits to develop the properties, including a permit for construction of an 8400-square foot home. By the time the county discovered its error and notified the Attards, they had made substantial progress toward installing a foundation for the new home…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. RangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John Doe v. Occidental Coll., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- 1041 20TH St., LLC v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- 49Hopkins, LLC v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Doe v. Occidental CollegeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Friedman v. City of FairfaxDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.