Tucker v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
In this proposed class action, plaintiffs allege defendant cell phone providers, Pacific Bell Mobile Services and Cingular Wireless LLC (collectively defendants) violated the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) by selling “ ‘bucket plans’ ” without informing consumers how the length of each telephone call would be calculated.
In early 2009, defendants deposed plaintiff Julia Knapp. During the deposition, plaintiffs’ counsel, J. David Franklin, wrote on a legal pad and showed it to Knapp. Franklin also instructed Knapp not to answer questions related…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Saxena v. GoffneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sierra Club v. San Joaquin Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Britts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Argaman v. RatanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tucker v. Pacific Bell Mobile ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Neville v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Van v. Language Line ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Agnone v. AgnoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- City of L.A. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.