Legal Opinion

Security-First National Bank v. Chapman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1940No. Civ. 12585PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff predicated upon the granting of its motions (a) to strike defendant’s answer, and (b) for a summary judgment under section 437 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, defendant appeals. These are the essential facts:

The complaint alleged that on or about August 10, 1935, S. J. and G. A. Chapman Corporation executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note in the principal sum of $18,000 bearing interest at 7 per cent per annum and that said note was secured by a trust deed executed by said corporation to the Los Angeles Trust and Safe Deposit Company as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bradley v. ButchartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Loeb v. ChristieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Arthur Earl McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Mariners Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Los Angeles v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API