Security-First National Bank v. Chapman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff predicated upon the granting of its motions (a) to strike defendant’s answer, and (b) for a summary judgment under section 437 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, defendant appeals. These are the essential facts:
The complaint alleged that on or about August 10, 1935, S. J. and G. A. Chapman Corporation executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note in the principal sum of $18,000 bearing interest at 7 per cent per annum and that said note was secured by a trust deed executed by said corporation to the Los Angeles Trust and Safe Deposit Company as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bradley v. ButchartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Loeb v. ChristieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by14 opinions
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Arthur Earl McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Mariners Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Los Angeles v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.