Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Christie

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1936No. L. A. 15726PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered against him in an action based on an unconditional guarantee of a promissory note payable to plaintiff, which guarantee was executed May 19, 1930. The note so guaranteed by defendant was secured by a trust deed and at the time of this suit the power of sale therein given had not been exercised by the plaintiff.

It is first urged that an action will not lie against a guarantor of a secured obligation until the security has been exhausted. On many occasions it has been declared by this court to be the rule that the guarantor’s liability may be enforced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Cooke v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Adams v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wiener v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. River Bank America v. DillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Kelley v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API