Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Hunter

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1937No. S. F. 15767PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

A hearing was granted herein after decision in the District Court of Appeal of the First Appellate ¡District, Division One, in order that we might more fully consider the applicability or nonapplicability to this cause of the proviso added to subdivision 1 of section 337 of the Code of Civil Procedure in 1933 (Stats. 1933, p. 2116). Our examination of the subject satisfies us that the District Court of Appeal, along with correctly disposing of other issues, properly concluded that said proviso, dealing with limitations of actions, furnishes no obstacle to the prosecution of the present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Foster v. BowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Curtis v. HoleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Weatherwax v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Arthur Earl McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Riverside National Bank v. ManolakisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. v. GaigeIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API