Legal Opinion

Garibotti v. Hinkle

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 2015No. G048680PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

— Nora Garibotti appeals from an order granting Bruce Hinkle’s motion to vacate a default judgment and the revised judgment the trial court entered based on that order. We reverse both the order and revised judgment because the court failed to rule on Hinkle’s motion within the jurisdictional time frame established by Code of Civil Procedure section 663a, subdivision (b).

That statute provides a trial court’s power to rule on a motion to vacate judgment expires 60 days after service of notice of entry of judgment or service of the first notice of intention to move to vacate,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Van Beurden Insurance Services v. Customized Worldwide Weather Insurance AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burch v. Certainteed Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People of Guam v. Branty Walliby aka Branty WalibySupreme Court of Guam · 2024
  3. Burch v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. City of Vallejo v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Mesa RHF Partners v. City of LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API