Legal Opinion

S.H. v. M.M. (In re C.E.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided January 31, 2019No. H045427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenwood, P.J.

*1040Appellant S.H.1 appeals the trial court's order denying her petition to remove Respondents B.M. and M.M.2 as guardians of her nephew, C.E., and to name her as C.E.'s guardian. Appellant raises five challenges to the order on appeal: the trial court erred when it failed to consolidate the guardianship action with the adoption proceeding; the judge assigned to the guardianship proceedings "sabotage[d]" her adoption petition and prejudged the petition for removal of the guardians; the assigned judge should have disqualified himself under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.1 ; the trial court…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maria G. v. Patrick M. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Ordaz v. Tate CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API