Legal Opinion

Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 2005No. B168847PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.

In this class action, a stockbroker challenges his former employer’s stock purchase plan, which used tax-deferred compensation to purchase restricted company stock for participating employees. If the employee resigned before the stock’s vesting period, both the unvested shares and the deferred compensation applied toward their purchase were forfeited. Plaintiff contends the forfeiture provision violates the requirement to pay wages upon resignation (Lab. Code, §§ 201-202), and constitutes conversion and unfair business practices (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.).

Early in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Mueller v. ZimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kim v. Citigroup, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API