People v. Tanner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*518Opinion
CLARK, J.
— People appeal from order striking jury finding that defendant used a firearm during the commission of robbery. The order disregards mandatory language of Penal Code section 1203.06.1 We conclude the trial court erred.
This appeal involves a single issue: Did the Legislature in enacting section 1203.06 intend its mandatory language be subject to preexisting statutory language providing that a “court may . . . of its own motion . . . and in furtherance of justice, order an action to be dismissed”?2 (§ 1385.) Section 1385 has been construed to provide judicial power to dismiss…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.