Legal Opinion

Pacific Wood & Coal Co. v. Oswald

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1919No. L. A. No. 4642PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facte are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought upon a bond accompanying a contract for road work to be done under the “Roa& District Improvement Act of 1907.” (Stats. 1907, p. 806.) A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, the plaintiff declining to amend, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The act to which we have referred is one authorizing the improvement of roads and streets outside of incorporated cities or towns, and the assessment of the cost upon the lands within a district to be fixed by the board of supervisors of the county. The procedure is,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sherman v. Am. Sur. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bricker v. Rollins & JareckiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Associated Oil Co. v. Commary-Peterson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
  3. A. L. Young MacHinery Co. v. CuppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. People Ex Rel. White v. StormIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bernard v. Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API