Legal Opinion
A. L. Young MacHinery Co. v. Cupps
California Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4097PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
In this action we granted a rehearing for the reason that we failed in the opinion heretofore rendered by us to pass upon the special demurrer interposed to the second amended complaint in this action by the defendant surety company. We are in entire accord with the conclusions reached by us regarding the merits of the general demurrer as set forth in our former opinion, and we express our approval of this opinion by adopting it in its entirety.
It reads as follows:
“Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant insurance company entered after the trial court had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Sherman v. Am. Sur. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Bricker v. Rollins & JareckiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Associated Oil Co. v. Commary-Peterson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Williamson v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. L. G. DeFelice & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Baker v. LittmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Thayer v. Board of Osteopathic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bernard v. Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- California Electric Supply Co. v. United Pacific Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.