Legal Opinion

Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Bancroft

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1914No. L. A. 3214; L. A. 3213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Appeals have been taken by the defendants and appellants in two eases from the judgments and orders denying motions for new trials. As the two actions are exactly similar they have been consolidated for the purposes of this decision.

The plaintiff corporation, a contractor with the city of San Diego, sued to recover from the defendants an assessment levied for the paving of Fifth Street in said city. General demurrers to the complaints were filed but were overruled. There was no argument on said demurrers. The trial was had before the court without a jury, resulting, as indicated above, in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Chambers v. SatterleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hewes v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Heft v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Pacific Wood & Coal Co. v. OswaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Highland Park Realty Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API