Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1917No. 8345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action of forcible detainer by J. A. Jones against William Gunn. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

This is a forcible detainer, action. Judgment was had for plaintiff below, and defendant below appealed here.

The record discloses that in 1909 Gunn procured a five-year lease upon the allotment involved, which lease expired on August 1, 1914. Before the expiration of said lease, and on January 10, 1914, this allotment was offered for sale by the government in the usual and proper way, and one Stone purchased1 the same and in due time obtained a deed therefor. A few days after the sale on January 10, 1914, Gunn endeavored to lease this property from the allottee .for five…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Shuler Et Ux. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Turley v. FeebeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Turner v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Bounds v. GoochSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Louis Berkman Co. v. Unger Metals Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Templeman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API