Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Wagg

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1910No. 269PublishedCited by 77 opinions

Error from District Court, Paiunee County j Bayard T. Plainer, Judge. Action by Mary B. Herbert against S. R. Wagg and others. From a judgment in favor of certain defendants,, the plaintiff brings error. Copies of briefs did not reach the reporter.

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN O. J.

This case presents error from tbe district court of Pawnee county. The action was originally begun on June IS, 1903, by W. H. Herbert and Mary B. Herbert, as plaintiffs, against S. B. Wagg, Leroy M. Brown, and approximately sixty-five other defendants. The object and purpose of the suit was to secure the cancellation of a warranty deed executed by Mary B. Herbert, on the 20th day of March, 1901, acknowledged May 28, 1901, and filed for record May 31, 1901, for eighty acres of land lying in Pawnee county, Oklahoma, near the town of Cleveland. A second amended petition was filed in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Burton v. ComptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API