Legal Opinion

Turley v. Feebeck

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1913No. 2618PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; W. L. Barnum, Judge. Action by John T. Turley against Maggie E. Feebeck and iTTip.1rmfl.-n P. Eitchie. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings ‘error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, C. J.

This action was originally brought by John T. Turley, plaintiff in error, against Maggie E. Feebeck and Hickman P. Eitchie, defendants in error, wherein he sought to have declared a resulting trust in his favor in and to lots 13 and 14 in block 9 in Woodlawn addition to the city of Sapulpa. He alleges in his amended petition that on the 6th day of December, 1904, he purchased from the Sapulpa Townsite Company said lots, and paid as a consideration therefor the sum of $200. He alleges that at that time he was a resident of the state of Kentucky; and that on or about said date, he forwarded to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nobles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Milner v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  3. Howard v. FarrarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Border v. CarrabineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Watson v. MurraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Render v. LillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Fuqua v. Tulsa Masonic Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Gunn v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Dunlap v. JeffreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API