Legal Opinion

Turner v. Cox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1929No. 18588PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

iSWINDALL, J.

This was an action for the purpose of recovering certain taxes, paid under protest, commenced by the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against the defendant in error, defendant below. Hereinafter, for convenience, the parties will be called plaintiffs abd' defendant respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

On February 18, 1926, the plaintiffs filed their petition in the district court of Hughes county, Okla., against the defendant, as county treasurer of that county, to recover one-half of certain taxes paid by them under protest for the fiscal yeair ending June 30,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Chambers v. Van WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Gunn v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Stockman v. LoeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Highway Commission v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Turner v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API